Washington v. Alameda County, 17-cv-05616-CRB. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180730a51
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO RULE 41(B) AS TO DEFENDANTS ALAMEDA COUNTY, AHERN, AND PANCONI CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . On July 2, Defendants Alameda County, Ahern, and Panconi filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff Jason Washington has missed the July 16 deadline to file an opposition. Accordingly, Washington is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE ON OR BEFORE AUG. 7, 2018, why his case should not be dismissed as to those defendant
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO RULE 41(B) AS TO DEFENDANTS ALAMEDA COUNTY, AHERN, AND PANCONI CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . On July 2, Defendants Alameda County, Ahern, and Panconi filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff Jason Washington has missed the July 16 deadline to file an opposition. Accordingly, Washington is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE ON OR BEFORE AUG. 7, 2018, why his case should not be dismissed as to those defendants..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO RULE 41(B) AS TO DEFENDANTS ALAMEDA COUNTY, AHERN, AND PANCONI
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
On July 2, Defendants Alameda County, Ahern, and Panconi filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff Jason Washington has missed the July 16 deadline to file an opposition. Accordingly, Washington is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE ON OR BEFORE AUG. 7, 2018, why his case should not be dismissed as to those defendants for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
