Karimi v. Golden Gate School of Law, 17-cv-05702-JCS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180730a59
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER SEALING DOCKET ENTRY AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Re: Dkt. Nos. 29-18, 80 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . Docket entry 29-18 is SEALED for failure to comply with Rule 5.2(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants have filed a redacted version of the same document as docket entry 79. Plaintiff Morteza Karimi has filed objections (dkt. 80) to the referral of this case for a mandatory settlement conference. A judge's sexual orientation does not implica
Summary: ORDER SEALING DOCKET ENTRY AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Re: Dkt. Nos. 29-18, 80 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . Docket entry 29-18 is SEALED for failure to comply with Rule 5.2(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants have filed a redacted version of the same document as docket entry 79. Plaintiff Morteza Karimi has filed objections (dkt. 80) to the referral of this case for a mandatory settlement conference. A judge's sexual orientation does not implicat..
More
ORDER SEALING DOCKET ENTRY AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 29-18, 80
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge.
Docket entry 29-18 is SEALED for failure to comply with Rule 5.2(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants have filed a redacted version of the same document as docket entry 79.
Plaintiff Morteza Karimi has filed objections (dkt. 80) to the referral of this case for a mandatory settlement conference. A judge's sexual orientation does not implicate the judge's ability to remain impartial. See generally Perry v. Schwarzenegger, 790 F.Supp.2d 1119 (N.D. Cal. 2011), affirmed sub nom. Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012).1 Any further filings raising such arguments will be stricken as frivolous. The Court will consider Karimi's remaining objections at a case management conference to occur at 2:00 PM on August 10, 2018. If Karimi files a request to appear telephonically, the Court will call him directly rather than requiring him to appear via CourtCall.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Supreme Court later vacated the Ninth Circuit's decision in Perry v. Brown on unrelated grounds. Hollingsworth v. Perry, 570 U.S. 693 (2013).
Source: Leagle
