Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ward v. County of Mendocino, 4:17-cv-00911-PJH. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180731848 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . WHEREAS the plaintiffs and defendants in this action have participated in a settlement scheduling conference under the guidance and recommendation of the assigned settlement judge in this matter, the Hon. Laurel Beeler, and WHEREAS the Case Management and Pretrial Order (Dkt. 31) was entered on June 19, 2017, before plaintiffs filed their Third
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT

WHEREAS the plaintiffs and defendants in this action have participated in a settlement scheduling conference under the guidance and recommendation of the assigned settlement judge in this matter, the Hon. Laurel Beeler, and

WHEREAS the Case Management and Pretrial Order (Dkt. 31) was entered on June 19, 2017, before plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. 59) on February 1, 2018, to add two additional defendants, Kathy Louise Goodman as Doe Defendant 1 and Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc. as Doe Defendant 2, and

WHEREAS defendant Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc. first appeared in this matter on March 7, 2018, and

WHEREAS defendant Kathy Louise Goodman first appeared in this matter on April 18, 2018, and

WHEREAS a settlement conference had been set for August 15, 2018, and

WEHREAS one of the Plaintiffs was diagnosed with a serious medical condition and will not be able to attend the August 15, 2018 settlement conference, and

WHEREAS the parties are currently working to continue the settlement conference to a date when all parties can be present, and

WHEREAS the non-expert discovery cutoff was reset to October 1, 2018, pursuant to the pretrial schedule set forth in the court's Case Management and Pretrial Order (Dkt. 85), and

WHEREAS all other deadlines originally set in this case remain and are as of the resetting of the non-expert discovery cutoff are incompatible with that date, and

WHEREAS the plaintiffs and defendants in this action are aware of the procedure for amending the court's Case Management and Pretrial Order (Dkt. 31) and have concurrently filed a letter brief with the court, in accordance with said procedure, and

WHEREAS good cause exists for an order amending the court's Case Management and Pretrial Order (Dkt. 31), as set forth above.

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE TO THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER:

Deadline/Hearing Currently Due/Set Proposed Due/Set Non-Expert Discovery Cut-off October 1, 2018 November 1, 2018 Disclosure of Experts August, 1, 2018 November 30, 2018 Rebuttal August 31, 2018 December 29, 2018 Dispositive Motions October 3, 2018 January 3, 2019 Expert Discovery Cut-Off November 11, 2018 January 11, 2019 Pretrial Conference January 10, 2019 August 15, 2019 Trial February 4, 2019 September 9, 2019

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer