JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.
This Court now has denied or dismissed each of the twenty-five claims of Petitioner's first and amended habeas corpus petitions. On April 4, 2002, the Court dismissed as procedurally defaulted Claims 4 and 14 and portions of Claims 9 and 12. See Dkt. No. 105. On June 27, 2002, the Court dismissed Claim 8 as duplicative of another claim. See Dkt. No. 115. On July 26, 2002, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Respondent as to Claims 13, 15, 19, 20, 22, and the remaining portions of Claim 9. See Dkt. No. 117. On December 29, 2008, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Respondent as to Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 10, 16, 18 (with the exception of sub-claim 18.B.7), 21, 24, and the remaining portion of Claim 12. See Dkt. No. 240. On December 19, 2017, following an evidentiary hearing, the Court denied Claims 3, 11, and 17 on the merits. See Dkt. No. 423. Finally, on August 17, 2018, the Court denied Claims 18.B.7, 23, and 25 on the merits. See Dkt. No. 431. The Court determined that a certificate of appealability was appropriate as to Claims 17, 18.B.1, and 25. See id.
Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in the orders enumerated herein, the Court hereby enters JUDGMENT in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner. Petitioner shall obtain no relief by way of his petition. The Clerk shall close the file.