Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Carroll v. Wells Fargo & Company, 3:15-CV-02321 EMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180824761 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiffs KELLY CARROLL, ANTONIO PONCE, and CHRYSTIANE LAYOG and Defendants WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., acting through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice. Each party agrees to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney's fees, and to waive all rights of appeal. IT
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiffs KELLY CARROLL, ANTONIO PONCE, and CHRYSTIANE LAYOG and Defendants WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., acting through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice. Each party agrees to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorney's fees, and to waive all rights of appeal.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer