Jacquez v. City of San Jose, 16-cv-05330-NC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180827778
Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2018
Summary: MINUTE ORDER FOLLOWING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Following the August 22, 2018 pretrial conference, the parties are to file the following by Wednesday, August 29: • Plaintiffs' planned use of attorneys' shared time, e.g. order of opening statements. • Defendants' motion to exclude smart phones with photograph capabilities from the courtroom during trial; plaintiffs' proposed alternative to this exclusion. • Plaintiffs' suggested alternative to the defe
Summary: MINUTE ORDER FOLLOWING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Following the August 22, 2018 pretrial conference, the parties are to file the following by Wednesday, August 29: • Plaintiffs' planned use of attorneys' shared time, e.g. order of opening statements. • Defendants' motion to exclude smart phones with photograph capabilities from the courtroom during trial; plaintiffs' proposed alternative to this exclusion. • Plaintiffs' suggested alternative to the defen..
More
MINUTE ORDER FOLLOWING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
Following the August 22, 2018 pretrial conference, the parties are to file the following by Wednesday, August 29:
• Plaintiffs' planned use of attorneys' shared time, e.g. order of opening statements.
• Defendants' motion to exclude smart phones with photograph capabilities from the courtroom during trial; plaintiffs' proposed alternative to this exclusion.
• Plaintiffs' suggested alternative to the defendants' proposed interrogatories regarding qualified immunity.
• Plaintiffs' finalized list of claims to be tried for purposes of jury instructions and verdict forms.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle