JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND OTHER DATES; [PROPOSED] ORDER

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

This Joint Stipulation to Modify Case Management Scheduling Order is submitted by all parties in this action, through their respective counsel, including: Plaintiff James Neuroth ("Plaintiff"); Defendants the County of Mendocino, Mendocino County Sheriff Thomas Allman, Sheriff's Captain Timothy Pearce, and current/former Sheriff's Deputies Lorrie Knapp, Frank Masterson, Craig Bernardi, Michael Grant, Jeanette Holum, Robert Page, and Christine De Los Santos (collectively, "County Defendants"); California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., Dr. Taylor Fithian, and LVN Jennifer Caudillo (collectively, "CFMG Defendants"); Correctional Medical Group Companies, Inc., RN Elaine Hustedt, and RN Claire Teske (collectively, "CMGC Defendants"); and the City of Willits, former Willits Police Chief Gerardo Gonzalez, and current/former Willits Police Officers Kevin Leef and Jeff Andrade (collectively, the "Willits Defendants"). Pursuant to this Stipulation, the parties jointly request the Court to modify the pretrial dates set out in its previous Case Management Scheduling Order entered on December 13, 2017 (Dkt. No. 232, the "Scheduling Order"), as well as other dates, as set forth below.

RECITALS

A. The course and schedule of events in this case have caused the parties to reevaluate the remaining dates set in the Court's previous Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 232), which are presently as follows:

B. The parties request the Court to revise the pretrial dates set out in the previous Scheduling Order for the following reasons:

1. The Court's request to revise the scheduling order due to the delay in the hearing on the Motions for Summary Judgment.

2. The parties are mindful of the Court's busy docket, and that it may take considerable time for the Court to issue a summary judgment order after the hearing on those motions.

WHEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and request entry of an order as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. The parties request the Court to consider modifying the scheduling guidelines set out in its Jury Trial Standing Order in this case as follows:

3. Nothing in this Stipulation and request for order is intended to modify the other matters addressed in any Court order unless expressly identified herein, nor does it preclude the parties from seeking additional relief from this Court, to amend this stipulation and order or otherwise.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based on the parties' stipulation, and with good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the previous Case Management Scheduling Order entered on December 13, 2017 (Dkt. No. 232) is hereby modified, and that the following dates are set in the instant case:

IT IS SO ORDERED.