ORDER

WILLIAM Q. HAYES, District Judge.

On August 3, 2018, Plaintiff Jerry Jackson initiated this action by filing a Complaint (ECF No. 1) (the "Complaint") and a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ("IFP") (ECF No. 3).

I. IFP

All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States, other than a petition for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $400.00. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); CivLR 4.5. An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay only if the party is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999).

The affidavit filed by Jackson states "I am unable to pay the costs of these proceedings." (ECF No. 3 at 1). Jackson's only income is $870.00 a month in "[d]isability," and he has $792.00 of monthly expenses in the form of rent, utilities, food, clothing, laundry, and public transportation. Id. at 1, 4. Jackson has no bank accounts. Id. at 2. Jackson's Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED.

II. Initial Screening

A complaint filed by any person proceeding IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) is subject to mandatory review and sua sponte dismissal to the extent it "is frivolous or malicious; fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). This screening standard applies to all civil actions filed by plaintiffs proceeding IFP. See Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845, 845 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam) ("[T]he provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) are not limited to prisoners.").

The standard used to evaluate whether a complaint states a claim is a liberal one. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976). However, even a "liberal interpretation . . . may not supply elements of the claim that were not initially pled." Ivey v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) provides "A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain . . . a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." "[A] plaintiff's obligation to provide the grounds of his entitlement to relief requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do." Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quotation omitted).

Jackson brings the following causes of action against Car Bahn: (1) violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, (2) violation of California Civil Code §§ 51, 54 et seq., (3) negligence per se, (4) negligence, (5) declaratory relief, and (6) injunctive relief. Compl. at ¶¶ 16-42. Jackson alleges that he is "mobility impaired," uses a wheelchair, and is "classified as having a physical impairment." Id. at ¶ 10. Jackson alleges that, on or about January 8, 2018, he "was denied full and equal access to Car Bahn LLC, dba Grater Grilled Cheese Shop . . . because the property was inaccessible to individuals belonging to the disabled community who use wheel chairs for mobility." Id. at ¶ 11.

Upon review, the Court concludes that the Complaint adequately states a claim for purposes of the sua sponte screening required under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Jackson is therefore entitled to U.S. Marshal service on his behalf. See Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1126-27; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) ("The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process, and perform all duties in [IFP] cases."); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2) (providing that "service be effected by a United States marshal, deputy United States marshal, or other officer specially appointed by the court . . . when the plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.").

III. Conclusion

The Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 3) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall issue a summons and provide Jackson with the summons, certified copies of both this Order and the Complaint, and a blank U.S. Marshal Form 285. Jackson shall complete the U.S. Marshal Form 285 and forward the Form 285 and the designated copies of this Order and the Complaint to the U.S. Marshal. The U.S. Marshal shall serve a copy of the Complaint and summons upon Car Bahn as directed by Jackson on the U.S. Marshal Form 285.