Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Metter v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 3:16-cv-06652-RS. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180917938 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF METTER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Julian Metter ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively referred to as the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to amend the current complaint to add two new plaintiffs and to dismiss Plaintiff Metter due to illness,
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF METTER

Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Julian Metter ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively referred to as the "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to amend the current complaint to add two new plaintiffs and to dismiss Plaintiff Metter due to illness, and request that the Court enter an Order to that effect as follows:

RECITALS

WHEREAS on October 11, 2017, the Ninth Circuit granted Uber's motion for a stay of its appeal and for a limited remand for this Court to conduct a mini-trial on the limited issue of contract formation of the arbitration agreement;

WHEREAS on October 26, 2017, the Court set a bench trial for January 10, 2018;

WHEREAS on December 28, 2017, Plaintiff's counsel learned that Plaintiff Metter was recently diagnosed with lymphatic cancer that spread from an earlier diagnosis of bladder cancer;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff underwent surgery on January 2, 2018, as part of his treatment and, as such, the Parties agreed to a short continuance of the bench trial to April 11, 2018, and an extension of all corresponding pre-trial dates, to allow time for Plaintiff's recovery from surgery;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff continued to undergo treatment for his cancer that severely limited his ability to travel and appear for the aforementioned bench trial on April 11, 2018, and the Parties agreed to a further continuance of the bench trial, which the Court continued to October 26, 2018 (Dkt. No. 89);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's health continues to severely limit his ability to travel and otherwise participate in this action and the Parties now agree that, to avoid further delays in this action due to Plaintiff's health concerns, it is necessary for Plaintiff to amend his complaint to name additional plaintiffs, whose information Plaintiff has provided to Defendant, and Defendant does not oppose the amendment to add these two new plaintiffs;

WHEREAS, the Parties further agree that Plaintiff Metter's individual claims should be dismissed without prejudice, given his health concerns and ongoing physical limitations, which severely and indefinitely affect his ability to participate as a named plaintiff in this action; and

THEREFORE, the Parties agree and request that:

1) Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint to add plaintiffs within 10 business days of entry of the Order on this Stipulation; 2) Plaintiff Julian Metter shall be dismissed from this action without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each side shall bear its own costs; and 3) The Court should vacate the October 26, 2018 mini-trial on the issue of Mr. Metter's contraction formation. Instead, Plaintiffs will file an amended complaint with two new plaintiffs. Thereafter, the Parties shall confer regarding the sufficiency of the allegations and whether it is necessary for Uber to move to compel arbitration as to the two new plaintiffs and/or whether a status conference will be required to resolve the issue prior to further briefing.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

1) Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint to add plaintiffs within 10 business days of entry of the Order on this Stipulation; 2) Plaintiff Julian Metter shall be dismissed from this action without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and each side shall bear its own costs; and 3) The October 26, 2018 mini-trial on the issue of Mr. Metter's contraction formation is vacated. Rather, Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint with two new plaintiffs. Thereafter, the Parties shall confer regarding the sufficiency of the allegations and whether it is necessary for Uber to move to compel arbitration as to the two new plaintiffs and/or whether a status conference will be required to resolve the issue prior to further briefing.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer