Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Buchanan v. Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd., 15-cv-01696-YGR. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180917d57 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING Re: Dkt. Nos. 332, 339, 340, 341, 363, 365, 367, 370, 383, 386, 391, 394, 405, 407 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Court hereby ruled on all pending sealing requests which are detailed in the attachments hereto and incorporated by reference in their entirety. To the extent that the Court denied parties' motions or granted them only in part, parties must now file the documents previously submitted for seal
More

ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING

Re: Dkt. Nos. 332, 339, 340, 341, 363, 365, 367, 370, 383, 386, 391, 394, 405, 407

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The Court hereby ruled on all pending sealing requests which are detailed in the attachments hereto and incorporated by reference in their entirety. To the extent that the Court denied parties' motions or granted them only in part, parties must now file the documents previously submitted for sealing in a manner that comports with the relevant sealing order.

Accordingly, the Court hereby SETS a compliance hearing for Friday, August 10, 2018 on the Court's 9:01 a.m. calendar, in Courtroom 1 of the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street in Oakland, California. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file the documents described above.

If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar.

This Order terminates Docket Numbers 332, 339, 340, 341, 363, 365, 367, 370, 383, 386, 391, 394, 405, and 407.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer