ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION; AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEPOSITION

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiff's "Request for Extension of Time for Deposition and Production of Documents," in which he has requested an extension of time for his deposition by Defendants so that he can bring documents with him to the deposition and request the production of documents to him. Dkt. 21. Also before the Court is Defendants' motion for a second extension of time to file a dispositive motion. Dkt. 25.

The Court first notes that the record shows that Plaintiff's deposition has already taken place. Dkt. 24 at 2. Defendants have informed the Court that during the deposition, "the parties discussed Plaintiff's request for an extension of time, discovery issues, and other aspects of this litigation." Id. They stated that "[b]ecause Plaintiff's deposition has already been conducted to the parties' satisfaction, Plaintiff's request is moot." Id. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendants' aforementioned statements. Therefore, the Court construes his lack of a response as his concession that his request is now moot. Accordingly, the Court DENIES as moot Plaintiff's "Request for Extension of Time for Deposition and Production of Documents." Dkt. 21.

Secondly, Defendants have moved for a second extension of time, through September 25, 2018, to file a dispositive motion. The Court has read and considered Defendants' motion and the accompanying declaration of counsel and, good cause appearing, Defendants' requested brief extension of time is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their dispositive motion no later than September 25, 2018.

Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court and served on Defendants no later than sixty (60) days from the date Defendants' motion is filed.

Defendants' reply brief shall be filed no later than twenty (28) days after Plaintiff's opposition is filed on the Court's electronic filing system. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.

The Court notes that this is Defendants' second extension in this case. The granting of regular requests for extension should not be expected.

This Order terminates Docket Nos. 21 and 25.

IT IS SO ORDERED.