Mercado v. Rogala, 18-cv-04271-NC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180919g68
Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice. Each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the present action be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party is to b
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice. Each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the present action be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party is to be..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice. Each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the present action be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own fees and costs.
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
I, Joel P. Waelty, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation for Dismissal. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby attest that David Henshaw, counsel for Defendant, has concurred in this filing.
Source: Leagle
