Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kim v. City of Belmont, 17-cv-02563-JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180925a51 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND THEIR COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 15 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: WHEREAS, on September 11, 2018 Plaintiff Chan Kim attempted to meet and confer with Opposing Counsel for the City of Belmont Defendants, Ms. Parry Black, and Peninsula Humane Society ("PHS") Defendants, Ms. Lynette Komar, to stipulate to extending the time for Plaintiffs to file their
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW PLAINTIFFS TO AMEND THEIR COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 15

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

WHEREAS, on September 11, 2018 Plaintiff Chan Kim attempted to meet and confer with Opposing Counsel for the City of Belmont Defendants, Ms. Parry Black, and Peninsula Humane Society ("PHS") Defendants, Ms. Lynette Komar, to stipulate to extending the time for Plaintiffs to file their Third Amended Complaint ("TAC"), which was ordered to be filed on or before September 13, 2018, pending the resolution of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to file a Motion for Reconsideration which Plaintiffs filed on September 10, 2018.

WHEREAS, Counsel for the City of Belmont Defendants agreed to stipulate to extend the time but Plaintiffs did not hear back from Counsel for the PHS Defendants before September 13, 2018, thus Plaintiffs filed their TAC in accordance with the Court's Order, Dkt. 70.

WHEREAS, on September 14, 2018 the Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file a Motion for Reconsideration on or before September 21, 2018. Dkt. 74.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Chan Kim again met and conferred with Counsel for the City of Belmont Defendants on September 18, 2018 to stipulate to allowing Plaintiffs to amend their complaint to allege Andrew's First Amendment claim pursuant to Rule 15 which provides that a party may amend its pleadings with the opposing party's consent, Ms. Black agreed to stipulate to allow Plaintiffs to amend their complaint to allege Andrew's First Amendment claim on September 20, 2018.

WHEREAS, on September 19, 2018 Mr. Brandon Gnekow informed Plaintiff Chan Kim that he was taking over for Ms. Komar in her representation of the PHS Defendants, and on September 20, 2018, Mr. Gnekow and Chan Kim discussed allowing Plaintiffs to amend the complaint in order to resolve a few issues related to claims alleged against the PHS Defendants to avoid another Motion to Dismiss.

THEREFORE, based on the foregoing circumstances, and in the interest of judicial economy, Plaintiffs, having met and conferred with Counsel for the City of Belmont and PHS Defendants, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court allow Plaintiffs to file a Fourth Amended Complaint on or before October 3, 2018 in lieu of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration ordered to be filed on or before September 21, 2018; this stipulation is made without prejudice to the City of Belmont and PHS Defendants' right to file a Motion to Dismiss if they deem it necessary.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having considered the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby Ordered that:

The briefing schedule for Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration is vacated. Plaintiffs shall file their Fourth Amended Complaint no later than October 3, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer