Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Looksmart Group, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, 17-cv-04709-JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180927814 Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND ANSWER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(a)(2) JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff LookSmart Group, Inc. ("LookSmart") filed its Complaint in this action on August 15, 2017; WHEREAS, Defendant Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") filed its Answer on October 13, 2017; WHEREAS, Microsoft wishes to amend its Answer to plead a Fifth Defense of unenforceability and has prepared a proposed Amended Answer, which is attac
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND ANSWER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(a)(2)

WHEREAS, Plaintiff LookSmart Group, Inc. ("LookSmart") filed its Complaint in this action on August 15, 2017;

WHEREAS, Defendant Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") filed its Answer on October 13, 2017;

WHEREAS, Microsoft wishes to amend its Answer to plead a Fifth Defense of unenforceability and has prepared a proposed Amended Answer, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and

WHEREAS, LookSmart has reviewed Microsoft's proposed Amended Answer; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), LookSmart consents that Microsoft may file the proposed Amended Answer; and

WHEREAS, Microsoft's proposed amendment will not affect the Court's schedule.

NOW, THEREFORE Microsoft and LookSmart, by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate that Microsoft may file the Amended Answer attached hereto as Exhibit A.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Microsoft shall file its Amended Answer within two days of the date of this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer