Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cisneros v. Vangilder, 16-cv-00735-HSG (DMR) (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180927833 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER Re: Dkt. No. 96 Re: Dkt. No. 97 DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . The court has reviewed the parties' joint discovery letter regarding expert witness Jeffery Hicks filed at Docket Nos. 96 (Case No. 16-cv-00735) and 97 (Case No. 16-cv-1320). Expert discovery closed in these cases on September 11, 2018. [Docket Nos. 86 (Case No. 16-cv-00735), 82 (Case No. 16-cv-1320).] Local Rule 37-3 provides that "no motions to compel expert discovery may be fi
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER Re: Dkt. No. 96 Re: Dkt. No. 97

The court has reviewed the parties' joint discovery letter regarding expert witness Jeffery Hicks filed at Docket Nos. 96 (Case No. 16-cv-00735) and 97 (Case No. 16-cv-1320). Expert discovery closed in these cases on September 11, 2018. [Docket Nos. 86 (Case No. 16-cv-00735), 82 (Case No. 16-cv-1320).] Local Rule 37-3 provides that "no motions to compel expert discovery may be filed more than 7 days after the expert discovery cut-off." Although the parties' letter is dated September 18, 2018, it was not filed with this court until September 24, 2018, more than seven days after the expert discovery cut-off. By no later than October 1, 2018, the parties shall file a joint letter that does not exceed one page explaining why the court should not deny the September 24, 2018 joint letter as untimely.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer