Farris v. 3M Company, 3:18-cv-04186-JST. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181019j05
Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION THAT ANSWER BY RICOH COMPANY, LTD. TO PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL COMPLAINT BE DEEMED ITS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiffs Melva and Gary Farris ("Plaintiffs") and RICOH COMPANY, LTD. (erroneously sued and served as "RICOH COMPANY LTD. (individually and as successor-in-interest to SAVIN CORPORATION and served through its general manager, RICOH USA, INC.)") ("RICOH COMPANY, LTD.") hereby stipulate, as follow
Summary: STIPULATION THAT ANSWER BY RICOH COMPANY, LTD. TO PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL COMPLAINT BE DEEMED ITS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiffs Melva and Gary Farris ("Plaintiffs") and RICOH COMPANY, LTD. (erroneously sued and served as "RICOH COMPANY LTD. (individually and as successor-in-interest to SAVIN CORPORATION and served through its general manager, RICOH USA, INC.)") ("RICOH COMPANY, LTD.") hereby stipulate, as follows..
More
STIPULATION THAT ANSWER BY RICOH COMPANY, LTD. TO PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL COMPLAINT BE DEEMED ITS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Melva and Gary Farris ("Plaintiffs") and RICOH COMPANY, LTD. (erroneously sued and served as "RICOH COMPANY LTD. (individually and as successor-in-interest to SAVIN CORPORATION and served through its general manager, RICOH USA, INC.)") ("RICOH COMPANY, LTD.") hereby stipulate, as follows:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and RICOH COMPANY, LTD. through their respective attorneys, that RICOH COMPANY, LTD.'s answer to Plaintiffs' original Complaint herein be deemed RICOH COMPANY, LTD.'s answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint.
All new matters are deemed controverted.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
