Farris v. 3M Company, 3:18-cv-04186-JST. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181019j06
Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION THAT ANSWER BY RICOH USA, INC. TO PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL COMPLAINT BE DEEMED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiffs Gary and Melva Farris ("Plaintiffs") and RICOH USA, Inc. (erroneously sued and served as "RICOH USA, INC. (individually and as successor-in-interest to SAVIN CORPORATION and as general manager of RICOH COMPANY, LTD.)") ("RICOH USA, Inc."), hereby stipulate, as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED
Summary: STIPULATION THAT ANSWER BY RICOH USA, INC. TO PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL COMPLAINT BE DEEMED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiffs Gary and Melva Farris ("Plaintiffs") and RICOH USA, Inc. (erroneously sued and served as "RICOH USA, INC. (individually and as successor-in-interest to SAVIN CORPORATION and as general manager of RICOH COMPANY, LTD.)") ("RICOH USA, Inc."), hereby stipulate, as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED b..
More
STIPULATION THAT ANSWER BY RICOH USA, INC. TO PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL COMPLAINT BE DEEMED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Gary and Melva Farris ("Plaintiffs") and RICOH USA, Inc. (erroneously sued and served as "RICOH USA, INC. (individually and as successor-in-interest to SAVIN CORPORATION and as general manager of RICOH COMPANY, LTD.)") ("RICOH USA, Inc."), hereby stipulate, as follows:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs and RICOH USA, Inc. through their respective attorneys, that RICOH USA, Inc.'s answer to Plaintiffs' original Complaint herein be deemed RICOH USA, Inc.'s answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint.
All new matters are deemed controverted.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
