Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Jacobsen, CR 15-00518 MMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181023f42 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING RESTITUTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Defendant, Robert Jacobsen, and the United States, by and through counsel, agree and stipulate as follows: Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3663A, defendant agrees to pay restitution of $2,430,662.47. That number includes the following specific amounts: (1) $180,662.47 to the Broderick Street Trust (the principals of which are S.H. and S.G.) which, according to escrow records, paid $180,662.47 of its
More

STIPULATION REGARDING RESTITUTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Defendant, Robert Jacobsen, and the United States, by and through counsel, agree and stipulate as follows:

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, defendant agrees to pay restitution of $2,430,662.47. That number includes the following specific amounts:

(1) $180,662.47 to the Broderick Street Trust (the principals of which are S.H. and S.G.) which, according to escrow records, paid $180,662.47 of its own funds in the purchase of the Broderick Street house; (2) $1.5 million to NATC, which has expended slightly over $2 million in connection with the Broderick Street house to this date, but which may recover funds from the proceeds of the sale of the property if it receives a favorable resolution of its litigation over the property and a successful sale of the property. The parties agree that an approximately $500,000 offset from current losses accounts for the reasonable possibility of NATC's future recovery as well as the reasonable possibility of NATC's ongoing accumulation of costs relating to the property. Counsel for NATC has informed government counsel that NATC agrees to this restitution figure.

(3) $750,000 to Old Republic Title Company, for the amount it paid to cover the losses on the Danville house.

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] RESTITUTION ORDER

Pursuant 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, defendant is ordered to pay $2,430,662.47 in restitution as part of the final judgment in this case. The Court finds that this is a reasonable determination of the amount of money that the victims lost as a result of defendant's scheme to defraud for which he has been convicted, and the Court finds that these losses were proximately caused by the scheme to defraud.

The Court orders that restitution be awarded to each victim in the amounts so stipulated by the parties.

In light of the above, the Restitution Hearing, scheduled for November 7, 2018, is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer