U.S. v. Puentes, CR 18-407 RS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181023f51
Visitors: 20
Filed: Oct. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Defendant Jose Gabino Puentes, Jr. is scheduled to appear before this Court for a status conference on Tuesday, November 13, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. Since setting that date, defense counsel has realized that she is unavailable on that date. Accordingly, the parties request that the hearing be continued to November 27, 2018 at 2:30 pm. Defense counsel continues investigate the case. The parties
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Defendant Jose Gabino Puentes, Jr. is scheduled to appear before this Court for a status conference on Tuesday, November 13, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. Since setting that date, defense counsel has realized that she is unavailable on that date. Accordingly, the parties request that the hearing be continued to November 27, 2018 at 2:30 pm. Defense counsel continues investigate the case. The parties ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Defendant Jose Gabino Puentes, Jr. is scheduled to appear before this Court for a status conference on Tuesday, November 13, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. Since setting that date, defense counsel has realized that she is unavailable on that date. Accordingly, the parties request that the hearing be continued to November 27, 2018 at 2:30 pm. Defense counsel continues investigate the case.
The parties stipulate there is good cause—taking into account the public interest in the prompt disposition of this case—to exclude the time from November 13 to November 27, 2018 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act, and that failing to exclude that time would unreasonably deny the defendant and his counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of counsel taking into account the exercise of due diligence, as well as continuity of counsel. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). The parties further agree that the ends of justice would be served by excluding the time from November 13 to November 27, 2018 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act and that the need for the exclusion outweighs the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
SO STIPULATED.
Source: Leagle
