Young v. Banorte, 16cv3124-WQH-BLM. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181024j42
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM Q. HAYES , District Judge . On August 28, 2018, the Court issued an Order which stated, [T]his Order constitutes notice to Plaintiff that the Court will dismiss this action for want of prosecution unless, no later than September 24, 2018, Plaintiff files a declaration showing cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 14.) The docket reflects that no response to the Court's August 28, 2018 Order has been filed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM Q. HAYES , District Judge . On August 28, 2018, the Court issued an Order which stated, [T]his Order constitutes notice to Plaintiff that the Court will dismiss this action for want of prosecution unless, no later than September 24, 2018, Plaintiff files a declaration showing cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 14.) The docket reflects that no response to the Court's August 28, 2018 Order has been filed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED t..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM Q. HAYES, District Judge.
On August 28, 2018, the Court issued an Order which stated,
[T]his Order constitutes notice to Plaintiff that the Court will dismiss this action for want of prosecution unless, no later than September 24, 2018, Plaintiff files a declaration showing cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
(ECF No. 14.) The docket reflects that no response to the Court's August 28, 2018 Order has been filed.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to S.D. Cal. Civ. R. 41.1.
Source: Leagle
