Sparks-Magdaluyo v. New Penn Financial, LLC, 16-cv-04223-RS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181025910
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiffs in this action originally appeared in pro se. Counsel recently filed a notice of appearance in this matter, stating that he represents plaintiff Phyllis Sparks-Magdaluyo. Subsequently counsel filed on behalf of Ms. Sparks-Magdaluyo a notice of dismissal of "the lawsuit." While is unclear whether counsel also represents plaintiff Melecio Magdaluyo and intended to dismiss the entire action,
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiffs in this action originally appeared in pro se. Counsel recently filed a notice of appearance in this matter, stating that he represents plaintiff Phyllis Sparks-Magdaluyo. Subsequently counsel filed on behalf of Ms. Sparks-Magdaluyo a notice of dismissal of "the lawsuit." While is unclear whether counsel also represents plaintiff Melecio Magdaluyo and intended to dismiss the entire action, t..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action originally appeared in pro se. Counsel recently filed a notice of appearance in this matter, stating that he represents plaintiff Phyllis Sparks-Magdaluyo. Subsequently counsel filed on behalf of Ms. Sparks-Magdaluyo a notice of dismissal of "the lawsuit." While is unclear whether counsel also represents plaintiff Melecio Magdaluyo and intended to dismiss the entire action, there is no indication Melecio Magdaluyo is otherwise continuing to prosecute this action.
Accordingly, if Melecio Magdaluyo intends to pursue his claims in this case, whether through counsel or in pro se, no later than November 16, 2018 he must file a written notice so stating. In the event Melecio Magdaluyo does not respond to this order, his claims will be dismissed and the case closed without further notice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
