U.S. v. Edwards, CR 14-00043 JST. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181030935
Visitors: 29
Filed: Oct. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION HEARING DATE TO NOVEMBER 30, 2018 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Based on the reasons provided in the stipulation of the parties above, the Court hereby FINDS: 1. Given that an Amended Form 12 petition has been filed alleging that Mr. Edwards violated the terms of his supervised release; 2. Given that the parties need time to assess the violations and to prepare this case for a potential disposition; 3. Given that this is a po
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION HEARING DATE TO NOVEMBER 30, 2018 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Based on the reasons provided in the stipulation of the parties above, the Court hereby FINDS: 1. Given that an Amended Form 12 petition has been filed alleging that Mr. Edwards violated the terms of his supervised release; 2. Given that the parties need time to assess the violations and to prepare this case for a potential disposition; 3. Given that this is a pos..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION HEARING DATE TO NOVEMBER 30, 2018
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Based on the reasons provided in the stipulation of the parties above, the Court hereby FINDS:
1. Given that an Amended Form 12 petition has been filed alleging that Mr. Edwards violated the terms of his supervised release;
2. Given that the parties need time to assess the violations and to prepare this case for a potential disposition;
3. Given that this is a post-conviction proceeding and that the Speedy Trial Act does not apply;
Based on these findings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the November 2, 2018, supervised release violation hearing date is vacated and reset to November 30, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., for a status hearing or possible disposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle