Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fridman v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 4:18-cv-02815-HSG. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181101989 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiffs Michael Fridman, Danny Gesel Reznik Fridman, and Jake Lechner ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LC, and Portier, LLC ("Defendants") stipulate and agree as follows, and request entry of the below proposed order approving their stipulation. WHEREAS, on September 14, 2018, Defendants filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration as to Plain
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY

Plaintiffs Michael Fridman, Danny Gesel Reznik Fridman, and Jake Lechner ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LC, and Portier, LLC ("Defendants") stipulate and agree as follows, and request entry of the below proposed order approving their stipulation.

WHEREAS, on September 14, 2018, Defendants filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration as to Plaintiffs Michael Fridman and Danny Gesel Reznik Fridman, and to Stay the Action, Including Jake Lechner's Claim, and noticed a hearing on the motion for December 20, 2018 (Dkt. No. 49);

WHEREAS, the parties appeared for a Case Management Conference in this case on October 23, 2018;

WHEREAS, on October 23, 2018, the Court issued a minute entry stating that "no case schedule will be set until a motion to stay has been e-filed and resolved by the Court," and that "the parties are encouraged to meet and confer to discuss stipulating to an expedited briefing schedule" on Defendants' anticipated Motion to Stay the Proceedings pending a decision on Defendants' September 14, 2018 Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay the Action (Dkt. No. 60);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's direction, the parties have met and conferred regarding an expedited briefing schedule on Defendants' Motion to Stay the Proceedings pending resolution of Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay the Action.

STIPULATION

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate to and request entry of the following briefing schedule on Defendants' motion to stay:

Filing/Event Deadline Defendants' Motion to Stay the Proceedings October 31, 2018 Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion November 9, 2018 to Stay the Proceedings Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion November 16, 2018 to Stay the Proceedings Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Stay the If the Court believes it would be helpful to set Proceedings a hearing on this motion, the parties request that the Court set a hearing date at the Court's earliest convenience.

ATTESTATION

I, Tiffany Cheung, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Stay. I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in this filing has been obtained from all signatories above.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Parties' Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Stay. The Court, having considered the parties' Stipulation, adopts the following briefing schedule on Defendants' motion to stay:

Filing/Event Deadline Defendants' Motion to Stay the Proceedings October 31, 2018 Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion November 9, 2018 to Stay the Proceedings Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion November 16, 2018 to Stay the Proceedings Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Stay the If the Court believes it would be helpful to set Proceedings a hearing on this motion, the parties request that the Court set a hearing date at the Court's earliest convenience.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer