Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Crayton v. Ramey, 5:18-cv-01450-BLF. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181105d59 Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITIVE MOTION BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . Counsel for Defendants G. Ramey, P. Sullivan, and J. Holmes (collectively, the "Defendants") filed a request for a seventy calendar day extension of time, up to and including January 14, 2019, in which to file a summary judgment or other dispositive motion. The Court has read and considered the request and counsel's accompan
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITIVE MOTION

Counsel for Defendants G. Ramey, P. Sullivan, and J. Holmes (collectively, the "Defendants") filed a request for a seventy calendar day extension of time, up to and including January 14, 2019, in which to file a summary judgment or other dispositive motion. The Court has read and considered the request and counsel's accompanying declaration, and finds that good cause exists to grant the request.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' request for an extension of time is GRANTED, and that Defendants' time to file a summary judgment or other dispositive motion is extended for seventy calendar days, up to and including January 14, 2019. If Defendants file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion, Plaintiff's opposition, if any, shall be filed no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date the motion is filed. If Defendants file a reply brief, it shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after the date the opposition is filed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer