Funko, LLC v. Wish Holdings, LLC, 18cv1293-LAB (BGS). (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181109d58
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER [Dkt. 9] LARRY ALAN BURNS , District Judge . Plaintiff Funko, LLC and Defendant Tastemakers, LLC have jointly moved to extend the time for Tastemakers to answer Funko's complaint. This Court's local rules state an extension is only to be granted "on a showing of good cause." LR 12.1. The parties argue "[g]ood cause exists . . . because the Parties have agreed to this minor extension and that no prejudice will result thereby. . . ." Dkt. 9. That'
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER [Dkt. 9] LARRY ALAN BURNS , District Judge . Plaintiff Funko, LLC and Defendant Tastemakers, LLC have jointly moved to extend the time for Tastemakers to answer Funko's complaint. This Court's local rules state an extension is only to be granted "on a showing of good cause." LR 12.1. The parties argue "[g]ood cause exists . . . because the Parties have agreed to this minor extension and that no prejudice will result thereby. . . ." Dkt. 9. That's..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER [Dkt. 9]
LARRY ALAN BURNS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Funko, LLC and Defendant Tastemakers, LLC have jointly moved to extend the time for Tastemakers to answer Funko's complaint. This Court's local rules state an extension is only to be granted "on a showing of good cause." LR 12.1. The parties argue "[g]ood cause exists . . . because the Parties have agreed to this minor extension and that no prejudice will result thereby. . . ." Dkt. 9. That's not good cause, so the parties' motion is DENIED. The Court grants an extension until November 14, 2018 to either file a response or show good cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
