Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Constantino v. Southern Humboldt Unified School District, 18-CV-02249-RMI. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181114c55 Visitors: 30
Filed: Nov. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ROBERT M. ILLMAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, Plaintiff ANN CONSTANTINO ("Plaintiff") and Defendants SOUTHERN HUMBOLDT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and COLLEEN O'SULLIVAN ("Defendants") through their respective attorneys as follows: 1. The initial Case Management Conference in this matter is scheduled for November 20, 2018, before this Court. 2. On October 23, 2018, plaintiff filed a First Amen
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESET CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, Plaintiff ANN CONSTANTINO ("Plaintiff") and Defendants SOUTHERN HUMBOLDT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and COLLEEN O'SULLIVAN ("Defendants") through their respective attorneys as follows:

1. The initial Case Management Conference in this matter is scheduled for November 20, 2018, before this Court.

2. On October 23, 2018, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint.

3. Defendants have informed plaintiff's counsel of their intention to file a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(b)(6). The Parties agree that the initial Case Management Conference should be held after the ruling on defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Defendants intend to set the hearing date on their Motion to Dismiss for December 11, 2018.

4. Based on the foregoing, the parties respectfully request the Court vacate the Case Management Conference and all dates attendant thereto. This request is made for good cause as the parties believe it is in the best interest of the court and the parties' respective economic and personal resources, and litigation expediency to wait until after the parameters of the dispute of the parties are determined by the court before the initial Case Management Conference is held.

5. The Parties further request that the initial Case Management Conference be reset to December 18, 2018, at 2:00 pm in the Eureka Courthouse or any anytime thereafter which is more convenient for the Court.

6. The parties further agree, should the court wish to, that a proposed scheduling order could be issued by the court and the Case Management Conference would be taken off calendar without being reset.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from all of the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a "/s/" signature within this e-filed document and I have on file confirmation of this concurrence for subjection production for the court if so ordered.

ORDER

The above stipulation is accepted and it is so ordered. The Case Management Conference scheduled for November 20, 2018, is VACATED to be reset, if necessary, shall be reset to December 18, 2018, at following the resolution of the motion to dismiss. 2:00 pm in the Eureka Courthouse, located at 3140 Boeing Avenue, McKinleyville, CA 95519. All associated deadlines shall be similarly continued.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer