Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Price v. Blue and Gold Fleet, 18-cv-02793-HSG. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181115972 Visitors: 27
Filed: Nov. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING AN ADR PROCESS STIPULATION HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . This Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiff Barbara Ann Price ("Plaintiff') and Defendant Blue and Gold Fleet ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record, with reference to the following facts: WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference was held in this action on November 6, 2018, the Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., presiding; WHEREAS, the Court directed the Parties to meet
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING AN ADR PROCESS

STIPULATION

This Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiff Barbara Ann Price ("Plaintiff') and Defendant Blue and Gold Fleet ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record, with reference to the following facts:

WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference was held in this action on November 6, 2018, the Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., presiding;

WHEREAS, the Court directed the Parties to meet and confer immediately following the Case Management Conference, and to e-file a stipulation and proposed order selecting an ADR process by November 13, 2018;

WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred in person on November 6, 2018 and again by telephone on November 9, 2018 regarding the selection of an ADR process;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, and subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

1. The Parties have agreed to the Northern District of California's mediation option (N.D. Cal. ADR L.R. 3-4(a)(2); 6). Plaintiff would prefer a non-attorney mediator, while Defendant would prefer a mediator who is an attorney experienced in employment law or a former judge.

2. The Parties agree to hold the ADR session by the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)

I, Robin E. Devaux, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory Barbara Price, Plaintiff.

Executed this 13th of November, 2018, in San Francisco, Californa,

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer