Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Reinecke v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., 3:18-cv-06848-YGR. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181120a98 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1(a)) RE DEFENDANTS THOMAS P. SCHMALZRIED, M.D. AND THOMAS P. SCHMALZRIED, M.D. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Plaintiff Greg Reinecke and Defendants Thomas P. Schmalzried M.D. and Thomas P. Schmalzried, M.D. A Professional Corporation, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1) Plaintiff's Com
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-1(a)) RE DEFENDANTS THOMAS P. SCHMALZRIED, M.D. AND THOMAS P. SCHMALZRIED, M.D. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Plaintiff Greg Reinecke and Defendants Thomas P. Schmalzried M.D. and Thomas P. Schmalzried, M.D. A Professional Corporation, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1) Plaintiff's Complaint was filed in San Francisco County Superior Court on September 24, 2018, and it was served on defendants on October 25, 2018.

2) The action was removed to the U.S. District Court on November 12, 2018, and the parties anticipate the action will be transferred by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to In re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2244, currently pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

3) In light of the anticipated transfer, plaintiff and defendants have agreed that defendants Thomas P. Schmalzried, M.D. and Thomas P. Schmalzried, M.D. A Professional Corporation, may have an extension of time to respond to plaintiffs' Complaint, through and including December 19, 2018.

4) By entering into this stipulation, defendant does not waive, and specifically preserves, any and all defenses he has, including lack of personal jurisdiction and all other defenses available under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12, and otherwise.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

*Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), Christopher Norton hereby attests that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing's content and have authorized the filing.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer