Filed: Nov. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION AND ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Come now plaintiff Richard Sepulveda, through his counsel of record Richard Mac Bride, and defendants Azimi Shahram, Zardnavard Mahrokh, and Lilian K. Wong, through their respective counsel not yet formally of record (for Azimi Shahram and Zardnavard Mahrokh, Samira Amato, Esq. of Law Office of Samira Amato; for Lilian K. Wong, Meera T. Parikh, Esq. of Poniatowski Leding P
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION AND ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Come now plaintiff Richard Sepulveda, through his counsel of record Richard Mac Bride, and defendants Azimi Shahram, Zardnavard Mahrokh, and Lilian K. Wong, through their respective counsel not yet formally of record (for Azimi Shahram and Zardnavard Mahrokh, Samira Amato, Esq. of Law Office of Samira Amato; for Lilian K. Wong, Meera T. Parikh, Esq. of Poniatowski Leding Pa..
More
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION AND ORDER
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Come now plaintiff Richard Sepulveda, through his counsel of record Richard Mac Bride, and defendants Azimi Shahram, Zardnavard Mahrokh, and Lilian K. Wong, through their respective counsel not yet formally of record (for Azimi Shahram and Zardnavard Mahrokh, Samira Amato, Esq. of Law Office of Samira Amato; for Lilian K. Wong, Meera T. Parikh, Esq. of Poniatowski Leding Parikh), to stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to General Order No. 56 and the Scheduling Order in this case issued on August 10, 2018, the deadline to hold the joint inspection is November 23, 2018; and
WHEREAS, the parties have filed a joint case management statement indicating that they are in settlement discussions, and
WHEREAS, the parties have not yet found a date for inspection that is mutually acceptable; and
WHEREAS, the parties would also like more time to set up the inspection, and also to continue to conduct settlement discussions that might avoid the need for an inspection or further litigation;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate that the deadline to conduct the joint inspection be postponed to January 15, 2019.
Law Offices of Richard A. Mac Bride — By: Richard A. Mac Bride /s/Richard A. Mac Bride
Attorney for Plaintiff Richard Sepulveda
11/20/2018
Law Office Samira Amato — By: Samira Amato /s/Samira Amato
Attorney for defendants Azimi Shahram and Zardnavard Mahrokh
11/20/2018
Law Office of Poniatowski Leding Parikh — By: Meera T. Parikh, Esq. /s/Meera T. Parikh
Attorney for defendant Lilian K. Wong
11/20/2018
FILER'S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order 45, Section X(B), I hereby attest that on November 20, 2018, I, Richard A. Mac Bride, the attorney of record for plaintiff herein, received the concurrence of attorneys Samira Amato and Meera T. Parikh, attorneys for defendants, in the filing of this document.
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONDUCT JOINT SITE INSPECTION
With respect to the case of Richard Sepulveda v. Azimi Shahram et al., Case Number C18-4882 HSG,
Having considered the parties' Stipulation for Extension of Time to Conduct Joint Site Inspection, and for good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. That the last day for parties and counsel to hold joint inspection of premises, with or without meet-and-confer regarding settlement, is reset for January 15, 2019;
2. All other dates that are calculated based on the inspection date will be adjusted accordingly.