Hampton v. Aqua Metals, Inc., 17-cv-07142-HSG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181121b44
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR PAGE EXTENSION AND GRANTING REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. No. 99 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . On November 16, 2018, Defendants filed a motion to extend the page limit for their reply in support of the motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 93, to twenty-five (25) pages. Dkt. No. 99. The parties additionally request an extension of the briefing schedule for the motion to strike, Dkt. No. 97, and the request for judicial notice, Dkt. No. 9
Summary: ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR PAGE EXTENSION AND GRANTING REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. No. 99 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . On November 16, 2018, Defendants filed a motion to extend the page limit for their reply in support of the motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 93, to twenty-five (25) pages. Dkt. No. 99. The parties additionally request an extension of the briefing schedule for the motion to strike, Dkt. No. 97, and the request for judicial notice, Dkt. No. 95..
More
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR PAGE EXTENSION AND GRANTING REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. No. 99
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
On November 16, 2018, Defendants filed a motion to extend the page limit for their reply in support of the motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 93, to twenty-five (25) pages. Dkt. No. 99. The parties additionally request an extension of the briefing schedule for the motion to strike, Dkt. No. 97, and the request for judicial notice, Dkt. No. 95.
Having reviewed Defendants' motion, the Court DENIES the request to extend the page limit. The Court GRANTS the parties' request to extend the briefing schedule. The briefing schedule will be as follows:
• Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the deadline for Defendants to file their response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike, which will be one combined brief for all Defendants, is continued to December 3, 2018.
• Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the deadline for Defendants to file their response to Plaintiffs' Request for Judicial Notice, which will be one combined brief for all Defendants, is continued to December 3, 2018.
• Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their reply in support of their Motion to Strike is continued to December 14, 2018.
• Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their reply in support of their Request for Judicial Notice is continued to December 14, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
