VACC, Inc. v. Davis, 18-cv-03454-JCS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181129a96
Visitors: 26
Filed: Nov. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO FILE EXHIBIT TO COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 7, 29 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . For the reasons stated in the November 27, 2018 declarations of Darryl Woo and Pei Hsien Ren, Plaintiff VACC, Inc.'s second administrative motion to file under seal (dkt. 29) is GRANTED, and the proposed redactions to the settlement conference transcript may remain under seal. VACC's first administrative motion to file the entire transcript under seal (dkt. 7) is G
Summary: ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO FILE EXHIBIT TO COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 7, 29 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . For the reasons stated in the November 27, 2018 declarations of Darryl Woo and Pei Hsien Ren, Plaintiff VACC, Inc.'s second administrative motion to file under seal (dkt. 29) is GRANTED, and the proposed redactions to the settlement conference transcript may remain under seal. VACC's first administrative motion to file the entire transcript under seal (dkt. 7) is GR..
More
ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO FILE EXHIBIT TO COMPLAINT UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 7, 29
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons stated in the November 27, 2018 declarations of Darryl Woo and Pei Hsien Ren, Plaintiff VACC, Inc.'s second administrative motion to file under seal (dkt. 29) is GRANTED, and the proposed redactions to the settlement conference transcript may remain under seal. VACC's first administrative motion to file the entire transcript under seal (dkt. 7) is GRANTED with respect to those proposed redactions only, but is otherwise DENIED. VACC shall file a public redacted version of the transcript no later than December 4, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
