California v. Zinke, 18-cv-05712-YGR. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181129b18
Visitors: 22
Filed: Nov. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO INTERVENE AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE Re: Dkt. Nos. 42, 49 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Having considered the unopposed motion to intervene filed by the State of Wyoming ("Proposed-Intervener") (Dkt. No. 42), the Court finds that the Proposed-Intervenor has an interest in this action that will not be adequately represented by the named defendants, and that this interest is sufficient to warrant intervention under Fede
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO INTERVENE AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE Re: Dkt. Nos. 42, 49 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Having considered the unopposed motion to intervene filed by the State of Wyoming ("Proposed-Intervener") (Dkt. No. 42), the Court finds that the Proposed-Intervenor has an interest in this action that will not be adequately represented by the named defendants, and that this interest is sufficient to warrant intervention under Feder..
More
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO INTERVENE AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 42, 49
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Having considered the unopposed motion to intervene filed by the State of Wyoming ("Proposed-Intervener") (Dkt. No. 42), the Court finds that the Proposed-Intervenor has an interest in this action that will not be adequately represented by the named defendants, and that this interest is sufficient to warrant intervention under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Proposed-Intervenor's motion to intervene.1
This Order terminates Docket Numbers 42 and 49.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Thus, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Proposed-Intervenor's motion to appear by telephone for the December 4, 2018 hearing.
Source: Leagle
