Finjan, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc., 18-cv-02621-WHO. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181130986
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON MOTION TO IMPUTE SERVICE Re: Dkt. No. 32 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Having fully considered the parties' papers and arguments at the November 28, 2018 hearing, and for the reasons identified in my tentative at the hearing, plaintiff's motion to impute service to Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. through its wholly-owned subsidiary Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. is GRANTED. Imputed service is appropriate under Cal. Corp. Code 2110, as Inc. can be consider
Summary: ORDER ON MOTION TO IMPUTE SERVICE Re: Dkt. No. 32 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Having fully considered the parties' papers and arguments at the November 28, 2018 hearing, and for the reasons identified in my tentative at the hearing, plaintiff's motion to impute service to Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. through its wholly-owned subsidiary Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. is GRANTED. Imputed service is appropriate under Cal. Corp. Code 2110, as Inc. can be considere..
More
ORDER ON MOTION TO IMPUTE SERVICE
Re: Dkt. No. 32
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Having fully considered the parties' papers and arguments at the November 28, 2018 hearing, and for the reasons identified in my tentative at the hearing, plaintiff's motion to impute service to Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. through its wholly-owned subsidiary Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. is GRANTED.
Imputed service is appropriate under Cal. Corp. Code § 2110, as Inc. can be considered Ltd.'s "general manager." The facts in this case are on all fours with those in Yamaha Motor Co., v. Sup. Ct., 174 Cal.App.4th 264, 267 (2009).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
