VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI, Magistrate Judge.
The Parties to this action hereby stipulate to an order of the Court as follows:
The Parties anticipate that discovery in this Litigation may involve production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting and defending the Litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the Court enters the following joint proposed Confidentiality Protective Order (the "Confidentiality Protective Order"). The Parties acknowledge that this Confidentiality Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The Parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12(c), below, that this Confidentiality Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks leave of Court to file Protected Material under seal.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
l.
m.
n.
o.
p.
q.
r.
s.
This Confidentiality Protective Order governs the use and handling of Material produced or given by any Producing Party during the Litigation, up to, and including, trial. Material designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" under the provisions of this Confidentiality Protective Order, and information derived therefrom, shall be used only for the purpose of the Litigation and any related appellate proceeding, and not for any other business, competitive, personal, private, public, or other purpose whatsoever. The protections conferred by this Confidentiality Protective Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (a) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (b) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; (c) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material; (d) portions of deposition or other transcripts and exhibits thereto that contain, summarize, or reflect the content of any such Protected Material; (e) portions of briefs, memoranda, or any other writings filed with the Court and exhibits thereto that contain, summarize, or reflect the content of any such Protected Material; and (f) written discovery responses and answers that contain, summarize, or reflect the content of any such Protected Material. The protections conferred by this Confidentiality Protective Order do not cover the following information: (1) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or which becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Confidentiality Protective Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (2) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party.
Even after Final Disposition of the Litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Confidentiality Protective Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs.
a.
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. A Designating Party shall not make clearly unjustified designations or designations for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties).
If it comes to a Designating Party's attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation and reproduce the Material with the correct designation.
b.
Designation in conformity with this Confidentiality Protective Order requires:
i. for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY," as applicable, to each page that contains Protected Material.
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or Materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which Material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all Material made available for inspection shall be deemed "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." After the inspecting Party has identified the documents to be copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which Material qualifies for protection under this Confidentiality Protective Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend to each page that contains Protected Material.
ii. for testimony given in deposition, that the Designating Party identify all Protected Material either (1) on the record, before the close of the deposition, or (2) by notice in writing to counsel of record within thirty (30) days of receiving the transcript of the deposition. Only those portions of transcript that actually contain "CONFIDENTIAL" and/or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" Material may be so designated. All deposition transcripts will be treated as "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" Material until a party designates any or all portions of the transcript as "CONFIDENTIAL" and/or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" Material or until thirty (30) days after receipt of the transcript, whichever is earlier. If a designation is made, the "CONFIDENTIAL" and/or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" portions of the transcript and exhibits, if filed with the Court, shall be subject to the filing requirements set forth in Section 12(c) below. If any depositions are videotaped or digitally recorded, those portions of the videotape or recording corresponding to portions of the deposition transcript designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" shall be afforded the same status.
iii. for testimony given in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the hearing or other proceeding, all protected testimony.
iv. with respect to electronic documents produced in native format, that the Designating Party shall designate "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" Material by stamping copies of the document or media, as appropriate, that contains the document with the appropriate legend.
v. for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY," as applicable.
c.
a.
b.
c. the Challenging Party may, for good cause, file a motion in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 that identifies the challenged Material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. Any motion brought pursuant to this provision must be accompanied by a competent declaration attesting that (1) the Challenging Party has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed by Section 6(b), or (2) the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner.
a.
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Confidentiality Protective Order.
b.
i. the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of Record in the Litigation, as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for the Litigation;
ii. the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for the Litigation, as well as their immediate paralegals and staff;
iii. any named party in the Litigation who has signed the "Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A);
iv. Experts (as defined in this Confidentiality Protective Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for the Litigation and employees of said Expert to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for the Litigation, provided that (1) such Expert and employee has signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A); and (2) such Expert and employee is not a current officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, and, at the time of retention, has no present plans to become an officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party within the next three years. If there is any doubt about whether an entity of which an Expert or employee is or has present plans to become (within the next three years) an officer, director, or employee of a competitor of the Designating Party, prior to any disclosure, the Receiving Party shall identify the entity to the Designating Party, which shall advise the Receiving Party within seven days of such identification whether the Designating Party considers that entity to be a competitor for purposes of the foregoing sentence (provided, however, that no party is obligated to disclose the identity of the Expert prior to the time provided by scheduling order). If the parties cannot agree on whether an entity constitutes a competitor for purposes of the foregoing sentence, they may seek the assistance of the Court.
v. the Court and its personnel;
vi. court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for the Litigation and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A);
vii. the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.
viii. any mediator, and his or her staff, who is assigned to hear this matter, and who has signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A).
ix. any other person with the prior written consent of the Designating Party.
c.
i. the individuals listed in Section 7(b) categories i, iv, v, vi, vii, viii, and ix.
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in the Litigation as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" that Party must:
a. promptly notify, in writing, the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
b. promptly notify, in writing, the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the Material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this Confidentiality Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Confidentiality Protective Order; and
c. cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in the Litigation as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY," as applicable, before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Receiving Party has obtained the Designating Party's permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential Material — and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in the Litigation to disobey a lawful directive from another court.
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Confidentiality Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify, in writing, the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform, in writing, the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Confidentiality Protective Order, and (d) request such person or persons execute the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently produced Material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review.
Any Party withholding documents based solely on the assertion of a privilege shall serve a privilege log within ninety (90) days after completing the production of documents responsive to the request to which the privilege was asserted. The Receiving Party shall then have a thirty (30) day period in which to meet and confer with the Producing Party regarding the privilege log and, if the Parties are unable to resolve any dispute, to seek relief from the Court, even if doing so occurs after the fact discovery deadline. A Producing Party need not generate a privilege log for documents withheld on the basis of the attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine that are dated on or after February 4, 2014, which date corresponds to the filing of the original Complaint (ECF 1) in this matter.
a.
b.
c.
Within sixty (60) days after the Final Disposition of the Litigation each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such Material. As used in this subdivision, "all Protected Material" includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty (60) day deadline that (a) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (b) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such Materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Confidentiality Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION).
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT,
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
I hereby attest that I have on file written authorization for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (s/) in this e-filed document.
I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of __________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that I have read in its entirety and understand the Confidentiality Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on _________________ ____, 20____ in the litigation entitled Hoai Dang v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., Case No. 3:14-cv-00530-LHK (N.D. Cal.) (the "Dang Litigation"). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Confidentiality Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Confidentiality Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Confidentiality Protective Order.
I further hereby irrevocably agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Confidentiality Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of the Dang Litigation.
I hereby appoint _____________________ [print or type full name] of _______________ _________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with the Dang Litigation or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Confidentiality Protective Order.