Gray v. Joule Yacht Transport, 18-cv-02007-PJH. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181206c57
Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 28 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over,
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 28 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, t..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 28
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The parties may, of course, substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time during this sixty day period.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
