Ruschke v. Medtronic, PLC, 18-cv-02515-PJH. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181219b20
Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The court having been advised by Magistrate Judge Corley following a settlement conference, that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice; however, if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereof to the opposing party, within sixty (60) days from the date of this order, that the agreed consideration for said set
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The court having been advised by Magistrate Judge Corley following a settlement conference, that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice; however, if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereof to the opposing party, within sixty (60) days from the date of this order, that the agreed consideration for said sett..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The court having been advised by Magistrate Judge Corley following a settlement conference, that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice; however, if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereof to the opposing party, within sixty (60) days from the date of this order, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the Court's calendar to be set for trial.
If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty (60) days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
