Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sream, Inc. v. Murshed, 5:18-cv-05689-NC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181219b36 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING THE ENTIRE ACTION [F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , District Judge . The Court has before it Plaintiffs Sream, Inc. and RooR International BV ( Plaintiffs ") and Defendant Wadee Murshed's (" Defendant ") Joint Stipulation Dismissing The Entire Action pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Having considered the Parties' stipulation, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS THAT: 1. Plaintiffs' Complaint and the Entire Action shall be a
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING THE ENTIRE ACTION [F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION

The Court has before it Plaintiffs Sream, Inc. and RooR International BV (Plaintiffs") and Defendant Wadee Murshed's ("Defendant") Joint Stipulation Dismissing The Entire Action pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Having considered the Parties' stipulation, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS THAT:

1. Plaintiffs' Complaint and the Entire Action shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice. 2. The other terms of the settlement shall remain confidential. 3. The Parties are to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. 4. The Northern District of California Shall retain jurisdiction over Plaintiffs and Defendant arising from or related to any future dispute over the confidential settlement agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer