U.S. v. Aguilar, CR 18-0119 RS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181220989
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER VACATING HEARING JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . On December 14, 2018, the parties appeared before the Court for a hearing on the government's proposed Protective Order. After hearing argument, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer regarding certain issues. The Court set the matter for further hearing on December 21, 2018. On December 17 and December 18, government counsel and defense counsel met and conferred regarding the proposed
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER VACATING HEARING JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . On December 14, 2018, the parties appeared before the Court for a hearing on the government's proposed Protective Order. After hearing argument, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer regarding certain issues. The Court set the matter for further hearing on December 21, 2018. On December 17 and December 18, government counsel and defense counsel met and conferred regarding the proposed ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING HEARING
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge.
On December 14, 2018, the parties appeared before the Court for a hearing on the government's proposed Protective Order. After hearing argument, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer regarding certain issues. The Court set the matter for further hearing on December 21, 2018.
On December 17 and December 18, government counsel and defense counsel met and conferred regarding the proposed Protective Order. Following these discussions, the parties agreed to the following:
(1) The government will produce the discovery materials previously marked as "Protected Materials," without a corresponding Protective Order, on or before January 16, 2019.
(2) The government will have until January 16, 2019, to prepare these materials for production, including by evaluating the materials for further redactions. Defendants reserve their right to challenge these redactions at a later date.
(3) Given the resolution reached by the parties, the hearing currently scheduled for December 21, 2018, should be vacated.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
