Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hmood v. Berryhill, 18-cv-04212-SK. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181228776 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2018
Summary: Stipulation of Extension of Time for Plaintiff to file brief in support of Motion for Summary Judgment; Order SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, by and through her attorney of record, and Defendant, by and through her attorney of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 60-day extension of time for Plaintiff's counsel to file a brief in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment, in light of the following: 1. Plaintiff's counsel is a sole practitioner an
More

Stipulation of Extension of Time for Plaintiff to file brief in support of Motion for Summary Judgment; Order

Plaintiff, by and through her attorney of record, and Defendant, by and through her attorney of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 60-day extension of time for Plaintiff's counsel to file a brief in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment, in light of the following:

1. Plaintiff's counsel is a sole practitioner and has other cases with impending deadlines. She has no one else to whom she can delegate the work. She needs additional time to complete the brief. 2. Plaintiff's counsel has emailed Beatrice Na, Esq., defendant's counsel. Ms. Na has indicated that she is agreeable to a 60-day extension of time for counsel to prepare her brief. 3. Should the request be granted, Plaintiff's brief will be due on February 25, 2019, Defendant's reply brief on March 25, 2019, and Plaintiff's optional response brief on April 8, 2019.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer