Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Vasser v. Bocanegra, 18-cv-00496-RS (PR). (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190104842 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Mail sent by the Court to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days ago. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) because plaintiff failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and because he failed to prosecute this matter pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Defendants' motion to extend time to file a dispositive motion is DENIED as moot. (Dkt. No. 22.) The
More

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Mail sent by the Court to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days ago. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) because plaintiff failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and because he failed to prosecute this matter pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Defendants' motion to extend time to file a dispositive motion is DENIED as moot. (Dkt. No. 22.) The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions, enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer