Thomas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 3:15-cv-00509-CRB. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190108774
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc., Rule 41(a)(1) CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff Richard Thomas by and through his attorney of record, Kimberly A. Millington of Millington Law Group and defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company through its attorney of record Cherie M. Sutherland of Hayes Scott Bonino Ellingson Guslani Simonson & Clause LLP, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, D
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc., Rule 41(a)(1) CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff Richard Thomas by and through his attorney of record, Kimberly A. Millington of Millington Law Group and defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company through its attorney of record Cherie M. Sutherland of Hayes Scott Bonino Ellingson Guslani Simonson & Clause LLP, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, DI..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc., Rule 41(a)(1)
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff Richard Thomas by and through his attorney of record, Kimberly A. Millington of Millington Law Group and defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company through its attorney of record Cherie M. Sutherland of Hayes Scott Bonino Ellingson Guslani Simonson & Clause LLP, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 41(a)(1), with the parties to bear their own costs and attorney fees.
PROPOSED ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
