ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE OPPOSITION

Re: Dkt. No. 28

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Salvador Agredano, proceeding pro se, brings this action against defendants Capital One, National Association ("Capital One") and Real Time Resolutions, Inc. ("Real Time"). On December 5, 2018, Real Time filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 8.) Plaintiff filed no opposition thereto, which would have been due on December 19, 2018. On December 6, 2018, Capital One filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint, also pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 12.) Plaintiff filed his opposition thereto one day late, on December 21, 2018, (Dkt. No. 22), and Capital One filed its reply in support of its motion on December 27, 2018, (Dkt. No. 24).

Plaintiff now seeks leave to file "his oppositions to Real Time and Capital One's Motion to Dismiss late." (Dkt. No. 28 at 2.) Given plaintiff's pro se status and in the interest of justice,1 the Court GRANTS IN PART plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff may file an opposition, but only to Real Time's pending motion to dismiss.2 The Court hereby accepts his late-filed opposition to Capital One's motion. Plaintiff's opposition to Real Time's motion must be filed no later than Thursday, January 17, 2019 and must comport with this district's Civil Local Rule 7-3.3 Any reply thereto must be filed one week thereafter.4

This Order terminates Docket Numbers 23 and 28.

IT IS SO ORDERED.