Buso v. Vigo Importing Co., 18cv1328-WQH-BGS. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190115c01
Visitors: 32
Filed: Jan. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM Q. HAYES , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk reopen the case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice of Lodgement (ECF No. 24) be stricken from the record. Any claims for costs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 54.1. On November 28, 2018, the Court issued an Order (ECF No. 22) granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12). The Order stated, "Any motions to file an amended complaint must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this o
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM Q. HAYES , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk reopen the case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice of Lodgement (ECF No. 24) be stricken from the record. Any claims for costs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 54.1. On November 28, 2018, the Court issued an Order (ECF No. 22) granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12). The Order stated, "Any motions to file an amended complaint must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this or..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM Q. HAYES, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk reopen the case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice of Lodgement (ECF No. 24) be stricken from the record. Any claims for costs shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 54.1.
On November 28, 2018, the Court issued an Order (ECF No. 22) granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12). The Order stated, "Any motions to file an amended complaint must be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this order in accordance with Local Rule 7.1." (ECF No. 22 at 12). The docket reflects that no motions to file an amended complaint have been filed within the time allowed by Local Rule 7.1.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall close the case.
Source: Leagle
