U.S. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, CR 14-00175 WHA. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190116a38
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2019
Summary: REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . By JANUARY 17 AT 5 P.M., defendant Pacific Gas & Electric Company shall clarify, with respect to the 2017 Annual Report compiled pursuant to the Fire Incident Data Collection Plan (Dkt. No. 956-4), which of the incidents listed in the 2017 Annual Report correspond to the eighteen October 2017 Northern California wildfires that CAL FIRE has attributed to PG&E's facilities. If any of the eighteen October 2017 Northern California wil
Summary: REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . By JANUARY 17 AT 5 P.M., defendant Pacific Gas & Electric Company shall clarify, with respect to the 2017 Annual Report compiled pursuant to the Fire Incident Data Collection Plan (Dkt. No. 956-4), which of the incidents listed in the 2017 Annual Report correspond to the eighteen October 2017 Northern California wildfires that CAL FIRE has attributed to PG&E's facilities. If any of the eighteen October 2017 Northern California wild..
More
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
By JANUARY 17 AT 5 P.M., defendant Pacific Gas & Electric Company shall clarify, with respect to the 2017 Annual Report compiled pursuant to the Fire Incident Data Collection Plan (Dkt. No. 956-4), which of the incidents listed in the 2017 Annual Report correspond to the eighteen October 2017 Northern California wildfires that CAL FIRE has attributed to PG&E's facilities. If any of the eighteen October 2017 Northern California wildfires were not included in the 2017 Annual Report, PG&E shall explain why such fires were not included and shall compile a list of any other 2017 fires that may have involved PG&E's facilities but were not included in the report.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
