J.M. ex rel. McDonald v. Oakland Unified School District, 4:17-cv-04986-HSG. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190125b16
Filed: Jan. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Defendant Oakland Unified School District's Administrative Motion to Hold its Motion for Attorneys' Fees in Abeyance and to Continue having come regularly before this Court for hearing, and after careful consideration of all papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that consideration of the Defendant's motion for prevailing party attorneys' fees and/or Rule 11 sanctions (Doc. 53), current
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Defendant Oakland Unified School District's Administrative Motion to Hold its Motion for Attorneys' Fees in Abeyance and to Continue having come regularly before this Court for hearing, and after careful consideration of all papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that consideration of the Defendant's motion for prevailing party attorneys' fees and/or Rule 11 sanctions (Doc. 53), currentl..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Defendant Oakland Unified School District's Administrative Motion to Hold its Motion for Attorneys' Fees in Abeyance and to Continue having come regularly before this Court for hearing, and after careful consideration of all papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that consideration of the Defendant's motion for prevailing party attorneys' fees and/or Rule 11 sanctions (Doc. 53), currently set to be heard before this Court on March 29, 2019, be held in abeyance until the conclusion of Plaintiff's appeal of this Court's order granting summary judgment (Doc. 51), ORDERED that the March 29, 2019, hearing be VACATED, and FURTHER ORDERED that the District have an opportunity to amend its motion pending the outcome of Plaintiff's appeal and the issuance of mandate by that Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
