Johnson v. Orchard Garden, Inc., 18-cv-01593-WHO. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190128623
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The Court having been informed by the ADR Unit that the parties to the action have agreed to a settlement, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The Court having been informed by the ADR Unit that the parties to the action have agreed to a settlement, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order s..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
The Court having been informed by the ADR Unit that the parties to the action have agreed to a settlement, IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
