Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Enertrode, Inc. v. General Capacitor Co., 16-cv-02458-HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190131928 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AS MOOT Dkt. Nos. 318, 358 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . On January 30, 2019, the Court entered final judgment memorializing the jury's verdict. Dkt. No. 384. Because the Court did not grant either party's motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a) before submitting the case to the jury subject to the court's later deciding the legal questions raised, Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b), the pre-verdict motions are now moot a
More

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AS MOOT Dkt. Nos. 318, 358

On January 30, 2019, the Court entered final judgment memorializing the jury's verdict. Dkt. No. 384. Because the Court did not grant either party's motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a) before submitting the case to the jury subject to the court's later deciding the legal questions raised, Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b), the pre-verdict motions are now moot and thus DENIED. See Dkt. Nos. 318, 358.

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b), a party may file a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and/or for new trial "[n]o later than 28 days after the entry of judgment." Unless otherwise ordered, any renewed motion will be taken under submission on the papers once the briefing is complete.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer