Filed: Feb. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2019
Summary: AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . WHEREAS, the parties wish to update the Court as to the status of the Supplemental Submission Regarding the Redemption Policy (the "Supplemental Submission") requested by the Court during the January 31, 2019 Telephonic Case Management Conference; WHEREAS, during the Telephonic Case Management Conference, the Court asked StarKist to endeavor to file the Supplemental Submission b
Summary: AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . WHEREAS, the parties wish to update the Court as to the status of the Supplemental Submission Regarding the Redemption Policy (the "Supplemental Submission") requested by the Court during the January 31, 2019 Telephonic Case Management Conference; WHEREAS, during the Telephonic Case Management Conference, the Court asked StarKist to endeavor to file the Supplemental Submission by..
More
AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
WHEREAS, the parties wish to update the Court as to the status of the Supplemental Submission Regarding the Redemption Policy (the "Supplemental Submission") requested by the Court during the January 31, 2019 Telephonic Case Management Conference;
WHEREAS, during the Telephonic Case Management Conference, the Court asked StarKist to endeavor to file the Supplemental Submission by February 7, 2019, but stated that StarKist could take additional time if needed;
WHEREAS, StarKist and its counsel have been working diligently to complete the Supplemental Submission, but need some additional time;
WHEREAS, StarKist anticipates that it will be in position to file the Supplemental Submission by February 11, 2019;
THEREFORE, the parties agree that the Supplemental Submission shall be filed by February 11, 2019.
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
ATTESTATION
I, J. Christopher Mitchell, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5.1(i)(3), that concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.
ORDER
The Court has considered the above Stipulation and finds that it is in the interests of all Parties and in service of judicial economy and efficiency.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
