Federfin Tech SRL v. Union Packaging, Inc., 18-CV-04614-HSG. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190213919
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff/Counter-defendant Federfin Tech Srl, an Italian corporation ("Federfin"), and Defendant/Counter-claimant Union Packaging, Inc. d/b/a Unionpack ("Unionpack"), through their designated counsel, that the above-captioned action of all parties in its entirety be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff/Counter-defendant Federfin Tech Srl, an Italian corporation ("Federfin"), and Defendant/Counter-claimant Union Packaging, Inc. d/b/a Unionpack ("Unionpack"), through their designated counsel, that the above-captioned action of all parties in its entirety be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff/Counter-defendant Federfin Tech Srl, an Italian corporation ("Federfin"), and Defendant/Counter-claimant Union Packaging, Inc. d/b/a Unionpack ("Unionpack"), through their designated counsel, that the above-captioned action of all parties in its entirety be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1), with each party bearing its own costs, and the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement and Release of All Claims entered into by the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
