Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Burgos v. Sunvalleytek International, Inc., 4:18-cv-06910-HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190220900 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's directive at the February 12, 2019 Case Management Conference, Plaintiffs Ines Burgos and Mongkol Mahavongtrakul (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendant Sunvalleytek International, Inc. ("Defendant," and with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"), have met and conferred and, pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5, jointly submit the following ADR proposal. The Parties have agreed t
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Pursuant to the Court's directive at the February 12, 2019 Case Management Conference, Plaintiffs Ines Burgos and Mongkol Mahavongtrakul (collectively "Plaintiffs"), and Defendant Sunvalleytek International, Inc. ("Defendant," and with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"), have met and conferred and, pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5, jointly submit the following ADR proposal.

The Parties have agreed to participate in mediation through the Court's ADR Unit for this dispute.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)

I, Kimberly A. Donovan, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 15th day of February, 2019, at Mountain View, California.

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the parties agreement to participate in mediation through the Court's ADR Unit with the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of this order referring the case to ADR).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer